Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He Juul Pods argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.